From The Atlantic
By Christopher L. Eisgruber
Claims that students are “steeped in cancel culture and reluctant to confront opposing ideas” don’t jibe with on-campus reality, argues Princeton’s President. The perceived gap stems from confusion of actual disruption and legitimate protest, as well as free-speech rankings that miscast controversy as censorship. Even the self-censorship under peer pressure that students cite is not unique to them but reflects instead a broader national decline in the ability and desire of Americans “to speak constructively to those with whom they disagree.” Read this article
|